1st Quarter Client Note

By Steven Smith

The S & P 500 Index returned 5.3% (with dividends reinvested) taking the market’s gains to around 70% from a year ago — when the financial world was on a precipice.

There has been an interesting style shift recently. The 2009 recovery was led by large-cap growth companies. But in the first quarter of 2010, small-cap stocks led the way, with a gain of 8.7%.  Large-cap value was up by 7.4%, while large-cap growth gained only 2.5%. Foreign markets continued to perform well on a local currency basis; but not so much for US investors, who were hurt by the strengthening dollar.

While there are signs of life, the “real” economy has not clearly begun a robust recovery. The stock market is a discounting machine, anticipating recessions and recoveries. But there remain economic challenges; such as housing, employment, Greece and the inevitable retraction of government stimulus. Not to mention the things we can’t see.

Rebalancing portfolios last year (buying when others were fearfully selling) certainly paid off for investors. Now there are signs that last year’s sellers are coming back into the market. It’s hard to say whether that is a good sign or a cautionary one.

I always find it helpful to see current market conditions in their historical context. The following chart shows the historical distribution of US market returns since 1926. The performance years are stacked in ascending order by return range.

recent_market_volatility_in_perspective

This chart illustrates that:

  • Market performance over the past two years has been extreme by historical standards. In 2008, US stocks experienced their second-worst calendar return in eighty-four years. Then, in 2009, stocks rebounded strongly to deliver a return in the top quartile of the historical distribution.
  • Over the long term, the market’s positive return years have outnumbered the negative return years. Since 1926, the market has experienced a positive return in almost three-quarters of the calendar years.

Of course, the order in which positive and negative returns will appear is unpredictable – at least through my crystal ball.

Bookmark and Share

This entry was posted on Monday, April 19th, 2010.

4th Quarter Client Note

By Steven Smith

From an investment perspective 2009 was a year for the history books. After being down 37% in 2008 the S & P 500 dropped another 25% through March 9; for a total fall of 57% from the October 2007 high. And then, beginning at the moment of maximum pessimism, the market recorded its greatest nine month gain in history — returning 65% — to finish up 25.5% for the year.

Due to the cruel nature of investment math (a 50% drop requires a 100% gain to break even) all stock portfolios have a ways to go to fully recover. But balanced portfolios, which didn’t suffer such large losses, have bounced back fairly well. Hopefully we won’t go through anything like that again – at least for a while.

The last couple of years have certainly proven that the improbable is not impossible. And there is a great deal of uncertainty as to whether the economic recovery will be robust or anemic. But one thing is certain; managing our emotions is a key ingredient to investment survival.

Bookmark and Share

This entry was posted on Saturday, January 23rd, 2010.

3rd Quarter 2009 Client Note

By Steven Smith

It has been one year since the seismic events of last fall – the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the near bankruptcy of Merrill Lynch and the government rescue of AIG. Six months ago there were fears of a return to the Great Depression. The rally off of what appears to have been the March 9 bottom continued in the third quarter. The S & P advanced 15.67%, for the quarter, which makes the total move a remarkable 56%; retracing a good portion of the losses over the past year. Investors who had the courage to rebalance in the spring have been particularly rewarded.

Interesting is talk of an impending correction — because we have come “too far, too fast” with the 50% upward move. That certainly wouldn’t be surprising. But such talk displays a high degree of confidence in the precision with which one might judge at what level the market “should be” at any given moment. Possibly, due to the enormous amount of emotional selling last spring, the market over-shot where it might have landed if all investors had rationally and dispassionately accounted for the clearly deteriorating fundamentals, rather than following the herd. (Not so easy.) In that case, maybe the market is exactly where it “should be” right now – 30% off the October 2007 highs. Of course, I don’t know where the market “should be” or where it is headed in the short term and nobody else does either.

In any event, having retreated – apparently — from the precipice, it is a good time to take stock of some lessons learned. One is that the world is only going to end once. Meaning that on all the other inevitable occasions of extreme global financial distress, losses suffered in a broadly diversified portfolio are not going to be permanent. By the same token, stocks can be extremely volatile in the short term and consistently timing correctly exits and entries is nearly impossible. So, the most important thing for investors to get right is how much exposure to this risk they need to achieve their goals and how much risk they can stomach so as not to dismantle their plans at the moment of maximum pessimism and capitulation. Manage that balance reasonably well and you’re a long way toward being a successful investor.

We’re in that funny season here in the high country. One day it’s sunny and mild. The next it’s snowing and cold. Rather like the market.

Be well,

Steve

Bookmark and Share

This entry was posted on Thursday, October 8th, 2009.

Local Capital Summit

By Steven Smith

Small businesses create most of the jobs in this country. But they face great difficulty in attracting the capital they need to survive and prosper. (When I think of a small business, what comes to mind certainly isn’t the SBA’s definition of one with 500 or fewer employees. But more like the businesses I tend to work with, having 10 or fewer employees.)

The Local Capital Summit which I attended on Monday, August 31 was convened in Denver to explore how “local capital” can nurture small, local businesses. (Were I really cool, I would have been tweeting or blogging using a smart phone, directly from the conference.  So, you’ll have to settle for an old fashioned blog post. My first of any substance.)

The summit was hosted by the Mile High Business Alliance, an organization similar to the Summit Independent Business Alliance (SIBA) of which I am a board member. A co-host was The Center for Innovation at Metro State College in Denver.

Local capital, as defined by the conference, includes financial capital, human resources and shared capital – all of which adds up to “business capacity.” The conference presented an opportunity “share and co-create innovative strategies” to manage these issues.

There were two keynotes: Will Raap, the founder of Gardener’s Supply of Burlington Vermont and Woody Tasch, former head of Investor’s Circle and current leader of the Slow Money movement.  Raap is dedicated to rebuilding the economy at the local level and has implemented a number of local strategies in connection with Gardener’s Supply, including an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), encouraging “intra-preneurship” among his employees and establishing the Intervale Center farm incubator program to foster the production of locally grown food in northern Vermont.

Woody’s recent book, Inquiries into the Nature of Slow Money, Investing as if Food, Farms and Fertility Mattered (Chelsea Green 2008) is serving as a catalyst to bring critical mass to the idea of relying far less on corporate agriculture and supporting local farms on a national basis, instead. He is also attempting bring this notion of disintermediation – getting investors closer to their investments — to other sectors of the economy as well. The first annual gathering of the Slow Money Alliance is taking place next week in Santa Fe.

One of the more interesting aspects was the open space process for determining and scheduling the presenters. Conference leaders had solicited ideas for presentations in advance and allowed participants to vote, but the actual sessions were determined by the particpants at the start of the conference. I attended as session on “Creative Capitalization” exploring ways for cash starved businesses to survive, including ideas like: barter, “venture labor” and the infamous “deli dollars.”

These conversations among small business owners, with contributions from accomplished, provocative experts are certainly inspirational. I hope next year’s conference is bigger and better.

Bookmark and Share

This entry was posted on Thursday, September 3rd, 2009.

Welcome to Mountain Money Blog

By Steven Smith

I do a lot of thinking about money and how folks can use it well. Turns out, I do a lot of talking and writing about this stuff, too.

Mountain Money Blog is my place to share with you all of the latest news and thinking about financial matters. Don’t get me wrong, though. This isn’t some stiff-collared stock report. Anything—and I mean anything—that could impact your financial lifestyle, how you run your business, or operating a non-profit in the mountains will be fair game.

And, you are always welcome to email me your comments, feedback, ideas, and suggestions for future posts.

So, if it’s about money and it’s on my mind, you’ll find it here. See you soon!

Bookmark and Share

This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 18th, 2009.